Network-on-chip (noc) with flexible data width

ABSTRACT

Techniques described herein may relate to providing a programmable interconnect network (e.g., a programmable network-on-chip (NOC)). A method may include determining a transmission parameter, bonding one or more channels of an interconnect network based at least in part on the transmission parameter, and power-gating any unused channels after the bonding.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No.16/234,212, filed Dec. 27, 2018, entitled “Network-on-Chip (NOC) withFlexible Data Width,” which is hereby incorporated by reference in itsentirety for all purposes.

BACKGROUND

The present disclosure relates generally to network-on-chip (NOC)circuits for integrated circuit devices and, more particularly, to anetwork-on-chip (NOC) that can flexibly support different data widths.

This section is intended to introduce the reader to various aspects ofart that may be related to various aspects of the present disclosure,which are described and/or claimed below. This discussion is believed tobe helpful in providing the reader with background information tofacilitate a better understanding of the various aspects of the presentdisclosure. Accordingly, it should be understood that these statementsare to be read in this light, and not as admissions of prior art.

Advances in microelectronics have enabled the continued increase intransistor densities for a variety of integrated circuit devices.Indeed, some advanced integrated circuits, such as field programmablegate arrays (FPGAs) or other programmable logic devices, may includelarge number of transistors that enable an increasingly wide variety ofprogrammable circuit designs that can implement a large number ofdifferent functions. In some programmable logic devices, data may bepacketized and routed to or from these different functions usingdata-transfer protocols over a fixed interconnect network circuit knownas a network-on-chip (NOC). Because a circuit design for a programmablelogic device may not be known in advance, however, the network-on-chip(NOC) may be designed based on likely use cases of a circuit design inthe future. Thus, if the network-on-chip (NOC) does not have a wideenough bandwidth for certain wide-band protocols, for example, thenetwork-on-chip (NOC) may be unable to accommodate those protocols.Likewise, when a circuit design uses a protocol with a bandwidth that issmaller than the bandwidth of the network-on-chip (NOC), thenetwork-on-chip (NOC) may be underutilized. This underutilization maycause inefficiencies in the FPGA design and lead to higher powerconsumption.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Advantages of the present disclosure may become apparent upon readingthe following detailed description and upon reference to the drawings inwhich:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a computing system that may be used toprogram an integrated circuit system having a programmable interconnectnetwork, in accordance with an embodiment;

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the integrated circuit of FIG. 1, inaccordance with an embodiment;

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of the integrated circuit system of FIG. 1programmed by the computing system, in accordance with an embodiment;

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an example of the programmable logic fabricand the programmable interconnect network of FIG. 3 as used in a fieldprogrammable gate array (FPGA), in accordance with an embodiment;

FIG. 5A is a block diagram of a generalized example of the programmableinterconnect network of FIG. 3, in accordance with an embodiment;

FIG. 5B is a block diagram of the programmable interconnect network ofFIG. 5A taken at a first time and being used to transmit data packetsthrough logically bonded data channels, in accordance with anembodiment;

FIG. 5C is a block diagram of the programmable interconnect network ofFIG. 5A taken at a second time and being used to transmit data packetsthrough logically bonded data channels, in accordance with anembodiment;

FIG. 6 is a block diagram of bridges associated with the programmableinterconnect network of FIG. 5A, in accordance with an embodiment;

FIG. 7 is a schematic representation of an example programmableinterconnect network of FIG. 3, in accordance with an embodiment;

FIG. 8 is a schematic representation of another example programmableinterconnect network of FIG. 3, in accordance with an embodiment;

FIG. 9A is a schematic representation of a sample configuration of theprogrammable interconnect network of FIG. 8, in accordance with anembodiment;

FIG. 9B is a schematic representation of a sample configuration of theprogrammable interconnect network of FIG. 8, in accordance with anembodiment;

FIG. 10 is a schematic representation of a sample configuration of theprogrammable interconnect network of FIG. 8, in accordance with anembodiment;

FIG. 11 is a schematic representation of a sample configuration of theprogrammable interconnect network of FIG. 8, in accordance with anembodiment; and

FIG. 12 is a method for determining a configuration of the programmableinterconnect network of FIG. 8, in accordance with an embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS

One or more specific embodiments of the present disclosure will bedescribed below. In an effort to provide a concise description of theseembodiments, not all features of an actual implementation are describedin the specification. It should be appreciated that in the developmentof any such actual implementation, as in any engineering or designproject, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made toachieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance withsystem-related and business-related constraints, which may vary from oneimplementation to another. Moreover, it should be appreciated that sucha development effort might be complex and time consuming, but wouldnevertheless be a routine undertaking of design, fabrication, andmanufacture for those of ordinary skill having the benefit of thisdisclosure. The techniques presented and claimed herein are referencedand applied to material objects and concrete examples of a practicalnature that demonstrably improve the present technical field and, assuch, are not abstract, intangible or purely theoretical.

When introducing elements of various embodiments of the presentdisclosure, the articles “a,” “an,” and “the” are intended to mean thatthere are one or more of the elements. The terms “comprising,”“including,” and “having” are intended to be inclusive and mean thatthere may be additional elements other than the listed elements.Additionally, it should be understood that references to “oneembodiment” or “an embodiment” of the present disclosure are notintended to be interpreted as excluding the existence of additionalembodiments that also incorporate the recited features. Furthermore, thephrase A “based on” B is intended to mean that A is at least partiallybased on B. Moreover, unless expressly stated otherwise, the term “or”is intended to be inclusive (e.g., logical OR) and not exclusive (e.g.,logical XOR). In other words, the phrase A “or” B is intended to mean A,B, or both A and B.

Programmable logic devices such as field programmable gate arrays(FPGAs) are advanced integrated circuits that have proven their valuefor processing operations and, as a result, many new use cases forprogrammable logic devices have evolved and emerged. Data may be routedto or from different areas of a programmable logic device using a fixedinterconnect network circuit known as a network-on-chip (NOC). However,programmable logic devices, as well as other integrated circuits, mayunderutilize fixed interconnect networks.

A programmable interconnect network (e.g., a programmablenetwork-on-chip (NOC)) with flexible data paths may support a variety ofpossible bandwidths, leading to more efficient utilization andscalability and may permit manufacturers of integrated circuits to meetquality of service (QoS) metrics and/or design parameters (e.g., where acustomer may specify a desired bandwidth or transmissioncharacteristic). For example, if an interconnect uses a fixed data pathwidth of 64 bytes (64B), and the fixed data path width transmits apayload with a width of 16 bytes (16B), then the interconnect isconsidered underutilized and power and/or resources may be wasted. Incontrast, a programmable interconnect network that has a programmabledata path width may be programmed to allocate a higher or lower datapath width based on an application of the integrated circuit.

The programmable interconnect network may include one or more data paths(also referred to as data channels and/or address channels based on thetype of data the data path transmits) and may transmit data between oneor more circuit elements of the integrated circuit via the data paths.For example, the one or more data paths may transmit data between one ormore application functional units programmed into a programmable logicfabric via the data paths. An application functional unit mayencapsulate a transaction into a data packet (e.g., a command packet)and may send the data packet to an additional application functionalunit or other component using a transport layer of the programmableinterconnect network and bridge circuitry. In this way, the bridgecircuitry may be within or on a boundary between the applicationfunctional unit that generates data and the programmable interconnectnetwork. It is noted that in circuits, such as application-specificintegrated circuits (ASIC) or other programmable circuits other thanprogrammable logic devices, an application functional unit may becircuitry that generates data to be transmitted to other circuitry viathe programmable interconnect network.

Routers of the programmable interconnect network may be logically bondedtogether based on transmission parameters associated with the data to betransmitted between the application functional units (e.g., based onexpected transmission patterns). The logical bonding may be done at atime of configuration for the programmable interconnect network based ontransmission parameters. Individual routers may be programmed during aconfiguration time to have master or slave configurations. Routers thenwork together (e.g., one master with one or more slaves) to transmit areceived data packet following a lockstep transmission format.Transmission parameters may include, for example, a direction oftransmission, power and/or latency considerations, transmissionbandwidth associated with the data to be transmitted, and/or aprioritization indication describing which respective transmissionparameter is to be a priority, or the like. Transmission parameters maybe derived by software during the circuit design process or may beincluded as indications in a file or as part of a circuit design to beoptimized, placed, and/or routed. In this way, the transmissionparameters may be based at least in part on a direction of transmissionindication, a destination application functional unit indication, adestination location indication, power considerations, latencyconsiderations, and/or a prioritization indication, or the like.

The routers, and associated data paths, are logically bonded togetherbased at least in part on the transmission parameters definingtransmission characteristics of data to be transmitted between routers(e.g., such as from one application functional unit to anotherapplication functional unit). Thus, more data channels may be bondedtogether to transmit data having a relatively larger bandwidth while alower number of data paths to transmit data having a smaller bandwidth.These implementations described herein may be carried out inprogrammable logic devices (e.g., FPGAs), application-specificintegrated circuits (ASICs), or any other suitable device (e.g., asuitable processor running instructions to carry out the programmableinterconnect network implementations of this disclosure).

With the foregoing in mind, FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of asystem 10 that may be used to program an integrated circuit 12. Theintegrated circuit 12 may be reconfigurable (e.g., FPGA) or may be anapplication-specific integrated circuit (ASIC). A user may implement acircuit design to be programmed onto the integrated circuit 12 usingdesign software 14, such as a version of Quartus by Intel®.

The design software 14 may be executed by one or more processors 16 of acomputing system 18. The computing system 18 may include any suitabledevice capable of executing the design software 14, such as a desktopcomputer, a laptop, a mobile electronic device, a server, or the like.The computing system 18 may access, configure, and/or communicate withthe integrated circuit 12. The processor(s) 16 may include multiplemicroprocessors, one or more other integrated circuits (e.g., ASICs,FPGAs, reduced instruction set processors, and the like), or somecombination of these.

One or more memory devices 20 may store the design software 14. Inaddition, the memory device(s) 20 may store information related to theintegrated circuit 12, such as control software, configuration software,look up tables, configuration data, etc. In some embodiments, theprocessor(s) 16 and/or the memory device(s) 20 may be external to thecomputing system 18. The memory device(s) 20 may include a tangible,non-transitory, machine-readable-medium, such as a volatile memory(e.g., a random access memory (RAM)) and/or a nonvolatile memory (e.g.,a read-only memory (ROM)). The memory device(s) 20 may store a varietyof information that may be used for various purposes. For example, thememory device(s) 20 may store machine-readable and/orprocessor-executable instructions (e.g., firmware or software) for theprocessor(s) 16 to execute, such as instructions to determine a speed ofthe integrated circuit 12 or a region of the integrated circuit 12,determine a criticality of a path of a design programmed in theintegrated circuit 12 or a region of the integrated circuit 12,programming the design in the integrated circuit 12 or a region of theintegrated circuit 12, and the like. The memory device(s) 20 may includeone or more storage devices (e.g., nonvolatile storage devices) that mayinclude read-only memory (ROM), flash memory, a hard drive, or any othersuitable optical, magnetic, or solid-state storage medium, or anycombination thereof.

The design software 14 may use a compiler 22 to generate a low-levelcircuit-design program 24 (bitstream), sometimes known as a programobject file, which programs the integrated circuit 12. That is, thecompiler 22 may provide machine-readable instructions representative ofthe circuit design to the integrated circuit 12. For example, theintegrated circuit 12 may receive one or more programs 24 as bitstreamsthat describe the hardware implementations that should be stored in theintegrated circuit 12. The programs 24 (bitstreams) may programmed intothe integrated circuit 12 as a program configuration 26.

A controller may receive the programs 24 (bitstreams) and operate toconfigure the integrated circuit 12 according to the programs 24(bitstreams). For example, as depicted in FIG. 2, the integrated circuit12 may be a FPGA that may be reconfigured according to the programs 24(bitstreams) to perform a wide range of tasks and/or functions.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the integrated circuit 12 of FIG. 1 andincludes a programmable interconnect network 28 (e.g., network-on-chip(NOC)) and programmable logic fabric 30 that is programmable (andreprogrammable) based on the programs 24 (bitstreams). The programmablelogic fabric 30 may include a number of programmable logic elementshaving operations defined by configuration memory (e.g., configurationrandom access memory (CRAM)). The programmable logic elements mayinclude look-up tables, registers, multiplexers, routing wires, and soforth. A designer may program the programmable logic fabric 30 toperform a variety of desired functions. The programmable interconnectnetwork 28 and the programmable logic fabric 30 may be programmed at asimilar or same time. Portions or regions of the programmable logicfabric 30 may be programmed to perform different functions and/orreplications of the same function. Sometimes, the programmable logicfabric 30 is programmed to interact with other circuitry viainterconnect boundary circuitry 31 and an interconnect block 32. Theother circuitry may include any combination of memory, transceiver,ASICs, and/or any suitable circuitry that may also be used in additionto programmable logic fabric 30 to perform processing or functionaloperations associated with the integrated circuit 12. The programmableinterconnect network 28 may be used to facilitate memory transactionsbetween multiple sectors, multiple dies, and/or between the integratedcircuit 12 and external systems. The programmable interconnect network28 may be further for decrypting configuration programs (bitstreams) 24(e.g., configuration data), for locally sequencing reads and writes toimplement error detection and correction on the memory, and/or forsequencing test control signals to effect various test modes.

As described above, the programmable logic fabric 30 may have twoseparately programmed portions, portion 33A and portion 33B. The portion33A may perform a processing operation separate from the portion 33B.The processing operation of the portion 33A may be unique and thereforedifferent from the processing operation of the portion 33B. In somecases, the portions 33 may transmit data between each other in order tocomplete the processing operation. For example, the portion 33A mayidentify a face in an image and the portion 33B may perform processingon the image excluding the face. In this way, it may be desirable totransmit data from the portion 33A to the portion 33B in order tocomplete the processing operation.

There may be two ways to do this. The first technique may be used tosend the data from the portion 33A to the portion 33B via a data path 34of the programmable interconnect network 28. The second technique may beused to send the data from the portion 33A to the portion 33B via a datapath 35 of the programmable logic fabric 30. Using the data path 35 maybe a slower, less efficient method of transmitting the data from theportion 33A to the portion 33B. In addition, the data path 35 may useprecious programmable logic fabric 30 in the path, making it a highercost option than the data path 34 of the programmable interconnectnetwork 28. The portion 33A may transmit data to the data path 34 viathe interconnect boundary circuitry 31. As will be appreciated, theinterconnect boundary circuitry 31 may include a variety of circuitry tofacilitate the packet-ing and/or transmission of the data between theportions 33. For example, the interconnect boundary circuitry 31 maycouple to application functional units of the integrated circuit 12 andmay use bridge circuitry to transition data between the portions 33 andthe programmable interconnect network 28.

As shown in FIG. 3, the integrated circuit 12 may operate in a dataprocessing system 36 to assist in processing a dataset 38. The dataprocessing system 36 may represent, for example, a computing device in adatacenter, which may process network traffic, image data, video data,financial data, or any other suitable form of data. In some examples,the dataset 38 may be processed using a machine-learning orneural-network algorithm that may employ the programmable interconnectnetwork 28 of this disclosure to transmit and communication data from afirst location to a second location within the integrated circuit 12and/or data processing system 36. A processor complex 40 may executeinstructions (e.g., software or firmware) stored in memory 42 to receiveand route the dataset 38, as well as to control the integrated circuit12. For instance, the processor complex 40 may run software to analyzeprocess network traffic, image data, video data, financial data, or anyother suitable form of data, offloading to the integrated circuit 12operations that are well-suited to processing on the integrated circuit12. The memory 42 may store the one or more programs 24 (bitstreams)that may be used to program a programmable logic fabric 30 of theintegrated circuit 12 (e.g., when the integrated circuit 12 is aprogrammable logic device (PLD), such as a FPGA).

FIG. 4 is a block diagram depicting the programmable interconnectnetwork 28, one or more routers 62, one or more physical paths 64 (e.g.,data channels), and interconnect boundary circuitry 31 each includingone or more application functional units (AFUs) 65 and bridges 70. Thisdepicted example shows the programmable interconnect network 28 as usedin a programmable logic device. Each of the AFUs 65 represent aprogrammed function of the programmable logic device and thus have beenconfigured through loading of the one or more programs 24 (bitstreams)into CRAM associated with logic blocks of the programmable logic fabric30. Thus, the AFUs 65 may generate and/or receive any suitablepacketized data from either external circuitry or from other AFUs 65 viathe programmable interconnect network 28. In some embodiments, theprogrammable interconnect network 28 is disposed around a perimeter ofthe programmable logic fabric 30 of the integrated circuit 12. When theprogrammable interconnect network 28 is not integrated into theprogrammable logic fabric 30, the integrated circuit 12 may includecircuitry to transfer packetized data from a first portion of theprogrammable logic fabric 30 to a second portion of the programmablelogic via the physical paths 64. The integrated circuit 12 may includethe bridge 70 to perform the transmission of data from the programmablelogic fabric 30 to the programmable interconnect network 28.

To facilitate the transfer of data between the AFUs 65, the one or morerouters 62 may transmit data between respective routers 62. For example,to transmit data from the bridge 70A to the bridge 70D, the router 62Amay transmit data to the router 62B, which may then transmit the data tothe router 62C. Transmission of the data through the other routers 62may follow a path including the routers 62C, 62D, 62E, 62F, 62G.

In some embodiments, an example interconnect network may have a hardenedtransmission path which provides a set bandwidth. When the correspondingFPGA is programmed to have and use the interconnect network, the FPGAmay use data which has a smaller bandwidth than the set bandwidth. Whenthis data is transmitted through the interconnect network, theinterconnect network is considered underutilized or over-provided (e.g.,as an example of overprovision) since the bandwidth of the programmableinterconnect network 28 is larger than a true bandwidth needed for asuccessful transmission. Overprovision of the bandwidth of theprogrammable interconnect network 28 may cause the transmission of datato be less efficient at least in terms of power consumption andutilization since more physical paths of the hardened transmission pathare powered on than is sufficient for the transmission.

To correct for this, a programmable interconnect network 28 may beprogrammed at a time of configuration of the programmable logic fabric30 to have an application-dependent bandwidth. In this way, the routers62 may be configured to logically bond subsets of the physical paths 64together to form larger paths. Thus, larger bandwidth paths may beformed from the physical paths 64 that individually have smallerbandwidths. The physical paths 64 may be bonded based on the particulardata usage expectations for the particular design loaded onto theintegrated circuit 12 (e.g., stored in configuration memory, such asCRAM). For example, at a time of configuration (e.g., programming) ofthe programmable logic fabric 30 (e.g., at a time of deviceconfiguration), it may be determined (such as by the compiler 22 orcomputing system 18) that a suitable bandwidth for the programmableinterconnect network is for one path to be 16 bytes and another path tobe 32 bytes. Thus, in response to this determination, the programmableinterconnect network 28 may be programmed to have one physical pathhaving a bandwidth of 16 bytes and another having a bandwidth of 32bytes, instead of the whole programmable interconnect network 28 beingprogrammed to have a bandwidth of 32 bytes.

While FIG. 4 depicts a specific use-case of the programmableinterconnect network 28, FIG. 5A is a block diagram of a generalizedexample of the programmable interconnect network 28. Thus, the depictedprogrammable interconnect network 28 may be used in a variety ofembodiments. As described above, each of the routers 62 areinterconnected to each other and to the bridges 70 to form theprogrammable interconnect network 28. Each router may be individuallyconfigurable to provide the logical bonding. For example, each routermay be programmed as either a master or a slave during a configurationof the integrated circuit 12 based on the number and pattern of logicalbonding to be made from the physical paths 64.

During operation and after configuration, one or more of the AFUs 65 maytransmit data into the programmable interconnect network 28 via thebridges 70 coupled to the transmitting AFU 65. The bridges 70 mayoperate to clock (e.g., transmit based on a clock signal defining thetime of transmission) the data from the data packet into theprogrammable interconnect network 28. Upon receiving the packetizeddata, each router 62 analyzes the data, looks up an identifierassociated with the data in a lookup table, and transmits the data toanother router 62 or coupled bridge 70 circuitry based on the resultsfrom the lookup table inquiry.

In some cases, the bridges 70 are to transmit one or more data packetsto an external circuit via the interconnect block 32. To do this, thebridges 70 transmit the data to the interconnect block 32. Theinterconnect block 32 may include circuitry to transmit the packetizeddata between the integrated circuit 12 and the external circuitry. Theinterconnect block 32 may assign the identifier to the data packet to beinterpreted by the routers 62 at a future time during the lookupoperation.

The depicted example of the programmable interconnect network 28 is ageneralized example of the programmable interconnect network 28. In thisway, the depicted programmable interconnect network 28 may be applied toa variety of network topologies. For example, the programmableinterconnect network 28 may be applied to mesh topologies, cubetopologies, hyper cube topologies, balanced and/or unbalanced treetopologies, ring topologies, split topologies, and so forth.

To elaborate on operation of the programmable interconnect network 28,FIG. 5B is a block diagram of the example programmable interconnectnetwork 28 of FIG. 5A performing a transmission operation at a firsttime and FIG. 5C is a block diagram of the example programmableinterconnect network 28 of FIG. 5A performing a transmission operationat a second time. FIG. 5B and FIG. 5C are explained in conjunction withthe FIG. 5A herein for ease of elaboration.

FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B, and FIG. 5C collectively depict a locksteptransmission operation. Data packet 71 is received in FIG. 5A at theinterconnect block 32, divided into smaller data packets 71A and 71B fortransmission through the programmable interconnect network 28. The datapacket 71 may be divided based on the number of logically bondedphysical paths 64 of the programmable interconnect network 28. The datapackets 71A, 71B are transmitted to the programmable interconnectnetwork 28 via the bridge 70.

From the bridge 70, the data packets 71A and 71B are transmitted inlockstep via the routers 62 to the target AFU 65. Lockstep transmissionis a transmission scheme where latencies are compensated for throughinherent delays introduced through the arrangements of the physicalpaths 64. For example, the data packet 71A is transmitted via acombination of routers 62 that, by the end of the transmission, equals anumber of routers 62 associated with the transmission of the data packet71B. Thus, a same number of clocking delay is added to the transmissionof the data packet 71 before reaching the routers 62 coupled to thedestination bridge 70.

Keeping this in mind, FIG. 6 is a block diagram of the bridges 70 thatare coupled to each other through the programmable interconnect network28 (e.g., NOC interconnect). It should be understood that there may beadditional components coupled between the bridges 70 and theprogrammable interconnect network 28. It should also be understood thatmany other topologies may also benefit from the disclosed techniquesdespite one particular interconnect topology being discussed herein.

A data packet to be transmitted may be processed by one or more of thebridges 70 and/or other processing circuitry before transmission of thedata packet from a first location to a second location is completed. Forexample, a destination decoder may communicate with a router 62 via anidentifier to communicate where the data packet is to be transmitted.The router 62 may use the identifier when referencing a look-up table todetermine a target address, where the target address indicates at leastin part a transmission direction associated with the data packet (e.g.,a storage location, a slave the data packet is to be transmitted to, orany suitable transmission directional information). In this way, therouter 62 may include configurable components, such as but not limitedto configuration memory (e.g., CRAM), and memory storing at least thelook-up table.

After determining the target destination (e.g., router 62 or bridge 70),the bridge 70 may transmit the data packet for transmission and routingto a different bridge 70. For example, a data packet from bridge 70A istransmitted through the programmable interconnect network 28 to thebridge 70B. As described above, this transmission is facilitated by therouters 62 transmitting data packets via the physical paths 64.

The physical paths 64 of the programmable interconnect network 28 mayinclude a data channel 72 and an address channel 74. The bridges 70 maytransmit a payload of the data packet separate from at least an addresscorresponding to the payload and stored in the data packet. The bridges70 may transmit the address (e.g., synthesized and interpretable by therouters 62) via the address channel 74 and transmit the payload via thedata channel 72.

Sometimes data transmission occurs between bridges 70. One way to couplemultiple physical paths 64 together includes using multiplepoint-to-point interconnections such that each bridge 70 is coupled toeach other bridge 70, as is shown in FIG. 7. FIG. 7 is a schematicrepresentation 84 illustrating an example interconnect network 87. Itshould be understood that interconnections and data paths have beensimplified for ease of discussion but that any suitable components mayalso be included along with the bridges 70 or between the programmableinterconnect network 87.

In the depicted example, each of the bridges 70 may communicate and/orfacilitate data packet transfer between each other. For example, bridge70A may communicate with bridge 70B and/or bridge 70E, 70F, 70G. Thebridges 70 may communicate (e.g., transmit data packets) throughpoint-to-point hardwired data paths 88 (e.g., channels, physical paths).In this way, for each time a transaction occurs some data paths are leftunused. For example, if bridge 70A is to transmit a data packet to thebridge 70B, the bridge 70A transmits the payload via a hardwired datapath 86 that includes the data channel 72 and the address channel 74described above. Therefore, losses and inefficiencies may be introducedinto the integrated circuit, in addition to using a relatively largenumber of interconnects and physical routing, by using this exampleinterconnect network 87.

In contrast to the interconnect network 87, an example of a programmableinterconnect network 28 is depicted in FIG. 8. FIG. 8 is a schematicrepresentation of an example programmable interconnect network 28. Itshould be understood that interconnections and data paths have beensimplified for ease of discussion but that any suitable components mayalso be included along with the bridges 70 or between components of theprogrammable interconnect network 28, for example routers 62, decoders,or any other suitable circuitry and/or processing functions tofacilitate with the routing and transmission of data packets. Theprogrammable interconnect network 28 may include one or more datachannels 72 (e.g., 72A, 72B, 72C, 72D) and one or more address channels74 (e.g., 74A, 74B). Each of the data channels 72 may be respectivelybonded together (e.g., logically bonded) in any suitable combination ofsub-group. For example, the data channel 72A and the data channel 72Bmay be logically bonded together.

To highlight the benefits associated with the bonding technique,consider how a single data channel 72 may have a particular bandwidth.For example, the data channel 72A may have a bandwidth of 16 bytes(16B). It should be noted that any of the data paths (e.g., data channel72 and/or address channel 74) may have any suitable size. When two datachannels are bonded together, the total bandwidth may be additive. Forexample, if the data channel 72A were to be bonded with the data channel72B, the total bandwidth may be 32 bytes (32B). In a similar way, if allfour data channels 72 were bonded, the total bandwidth may be 64 bytes(64B). Thus, the respective data channels 72 may be selectively bondedto each other to transmit data packets of different bandwidths. In thisway, the data channels 72 sufficient to transmit the data are enabledand used in transmitting the data.

Similarly, the address channels 74 may each have a particular bandwidth,such as 8 bytes (8B). The address channels 74 may also be selectivelypowered at a time of programming of the programmable logic fabric 30.Upon the compiler 22 or computing system 18 determining which channels72, 74 to bond and which channels 72, 74 to leave unused, the unusedchannels 72, 74 may be power-gated (e.g., reduction of power supplied tothe channel 72, 74) or may have power removed (e.g., disconnecting froma power supply of the integrated circuit 12). For example, if the datachannel 72A were to be bonded to the data channel 72B and the datachannel 72C and the data channel 72D were left unused, the data channel72D may be power-gated (e.g., reduced, reduced to zero in a powerremoval). Through power-gating or removing power supplied to the unusedchannels of the channels 72, 74, power consumed by the programmableinterconnect network 28 may be reduced, therefore also reducing powerconsumed by the integrated circuit 12. Thus, benefits of using thetechniques described herein not only include improved utilization of theprogrammable interconnect network 28 but also include reducing powerconsumed by the programmable interconnect network 28.

Bonding may be permitted using any suitable logical (e.g., logic-based)bonding technique. For example, one or more respective data channels 72may be bonded by using master-slave techniques, or any suitabletechnique or combination of techniques. The master-slave technique useslockstep operation to logically bond respective data channels 72. Thelockstep operation permits the logically bonded data channels 72 totransmit portions of the same data packet in parallel with each otherbut offset in position (as described above with reference to FIG. 5A,FIG. 5B, and FIG. 5C). The master-slave technique may use one or morewell-defined states (e.g., associated with state machines) to generate apredictable output in response to a particular input to the particulardata channel 72. More particularly, one or more routers 62 associatedwith the bonded data channels 72 may operate in lockstep with eachother, such that the one or more routers 62 may output (e.g., respond)the same to the same input. When the data channels are logically bondedtogether, a same particular input to one or more logically bondedrouters 62 may generate a same predictable output, such that each bondeddata channel acts in lockstep to complete (e.g., fulfil) a transmission.In this way, a master router 62 may receive an input, generate theoutput, and instruct one or more slave routers 62 to output the sameoutput (e.g., where the data channel 72 receiving the instruction is theslave data channel 72) but offset in position to permit lockstepoperation over time. Thus, the master router 62 transmits equivalentlyto the slave routers 62, therefore enabling logical bonding to occur.

Keeping the foregoing in mind, FIG. 9A is a schematic representationillustrating a sample configuration of the programmable interconnectnetwork 28. FIG. 9B is a schematic representation illustrating anembodiment of the sample configuration of FIG. 9A. It is noted thateither sample configuration depicted in FIG. 9A or FIG. 9B may be avalid configuration to apply to the programmable interconnect network 28at a time of programmable logic fabric 30 configuration to meettransmission parameters of the transactions to be performed. For ease ofcomparison, FIG. 9A and FIG. 9B are described below together.

In this use-case example, a first transaction of size 32 bytes is to besent from bridge 70B to bridge 70A and a second transaction of size 32bytes is to be sent mutually exclusive of the first transaction frombridge 70C to bridge 70D. In both transactions, bandwidth utilization isprioritized but power consumption is still also considered. The compiler22 and/or computing system 18 may determine these transmissionparameters at a time of design analysis for the programmable logicfabric 30 configuration.

FIG. 9A depicts a first solution option where a first logical channel isprovided by bonding the data channel 72A with the data channel 72B(e.g., total of 32 bytes). The compiler 22 and/or the computing system18 may determine to power-gate or power-off the remaining data channels,that is, data channel 72C and data channel 72D. The address channel 74Amay be used to transmit the address associated with the transaction andthe address channel 74B may be power-gated or, in some cases,powered-off. The transaction between the bridge 70C and the bridge 70Dmay use the same bonded data channels 72A, 72B and the same addresschannel 74A (e.g., as depicted in FIG. 9A). Or, the transaction betweenthe bridge 70C and the bridge 70D may use differently bonded datachannels.

FIG. 9B depicts a second solution option where a first logical channelis provided by bonding the data channel 72A with the data channel 72B(e.g., 32 bytes), and a second logical channel (e.g., 32 bytes) isprovided by bonding the data channel 72C with the data channel 72C.Since separate data channels 72 are bonded into separate sub-groups,both the address channels 72 are to be used during transmission, thusneither the address channel 72A nor the address channel 74B may bepower-gated. It is noted that in this example, none of the depicted datachannels 72 are power-gated or powered-off since each are used.

To explain another use case example, FIG. 10 is a schematicrepresentation illustrating a sample configuration of the programmableinterconnect network 28. In this use-case example, a first transactionof size 32 bytes is to be sent from the bridge 70B to the bridge 70C, asecond transaction of size 16 bytes is to be sent from the bridge 70A tothe bridge 70C, and a third transaction of size 16 bytes is to be sentfrom the bridge 70E to the bridge 70F. In the first transition,bandwidth utilization and latency concerns are prioritized while in thesecond and third transactions, the latency concerns are prioritized overthe bandwidth utilization. The compiler 22 and/or the computing system18 may determine these transmission parameters at the time of analysisof the data packets to be transmitted.

The depicted solution includes one 32 byte logical channel and one 16byte logical channels for the three transactions. The first transactionuses the 32 byte logical channel provided by bonding the data channel72A with the data channel 72B. The first transaction uses the addresschannel 74A. The second transaction and the third transaction share thedata channel 72C. Since both transactions (e.g., second transaction andthird transaction) may occur without interrupting any transaction paths,the same address channel 74B and same data channel 72C may be used. Thedata channel 72D may be unused, and thus may be power-gated or, in somecases, powered-off.

To explain yet another use case example, FIG. 11 is a schematicrepresentation illustrating another sample configuration of theprogrammable interconnect network 28. In this use-case example, atransaction of size 64 bytes is to be sent from bridge 70B to bridge70C, bridge 70A, and bridge 70D. For this transition, bandwidthutilization is prioritized. The compiler 22 and/or the computing system18 may determine these transmission parameters at the time of analysisof the data packets to be transmitted.

The depicted solution includes one 64 byte logical channel thetransaction. The transaction uses the 64 byte logical channel providedby bonding the data channel 72A with the data channel 72B, the datachannel 72C, and the data channel 72D. This transaction is depicted asusing the address channel 74A. The address channel 74B may be unused,and thus may be power-gated or, in some cases, powered-off. It is notedthat in this example, none of the depicted data channels 72 arepower-gated or powered-off since each are used.

To help explain the process of configuring the programmable interconnectnetwork 28, as described above, FIG. 12 is a method 90 for determining aconfiguration of the programmable interconnect network 28. Generally themethod 90 includes determining transmission parameters (block 92),bonding the programmable interconnect network 28 based at least in parton the transmission parameters (block 94), and power-gating any unusedchannels (block 96). In some embodiments, the method 90 may beimplemented at least in part by executing instructions stored in atangible, non-transitory, computer-readable medium, such as the memory42, using processing circuitry, such as the compiler 22 and/or thecomputing system 18.

Thus, in some embodiments, compiler 22 and/or the computing system 18may determine transmission parameters associated with a currentconfiguration to be processed and loaded into the integrated circuit 12associated with the programmable interconnect network 28 (e.g.,programmable logic fabric 30) (block 92). As defined above, transmissionparameters include any setting or configuration option that is takeninto account when determining how to route a data packet through theprogrammable interconnect network 28 and to which bridges 70 to routethe data packets to. In this way, transmission parameters include adirection of transmission, an indication of destination bridge 70 ordestination location, power and/or latency considerations, transmissionbandwidth associated with the data to be transmitted, or the like. Insome embodiments, transmission parameters also include a prioritizationindication that indicates which of the transmission parameters is thepriority (e.g., a fulfillment priority) when finalizing theconfiguration of the programmable interconnect network 28. Thetransmission parameters may be determined by one or more of the bridges70 or by any other suitable processing circuitry associated with theintegrated circuit 12.

After determining the transmission parameters, the compiler 22 and/orthe computing system 18 may bond the programmable interconnect network28 based at least in part on the transmission parameters (block 94). Theprogrammable interconnect network 28 is a dynamically configurableconnection network that is selectively bonded and used on a per-usebasis (e.g., per device-configuration basis). In this way, theprogrammable interconnect network 28 may be adjusted to account forchanges in the transmission parameters of different deviceconfigurations. The transmission parameters may be re-determined andused to re-bond the programmable interconnect network 28 in response toa re-configuration of the programmable logic fabric 30 or a partialreconfiguration of the programmable logic fabric 30, or in response toany suitable change in the integrated circuit 12. In the specificuse-case of an FPGA or programmable logic device, partialreconfiguration of the programmable logic fabric 30 may occur when aportion of the programmable logic fabric 30 is updated with aconfiguration file to perform a modified function. As such, transmissionparameters associated with the portion of the programmable logic fabric30 may also change with the partial reconfiguration. Thus, the changedtransmission parameters may be used to reprogram the programmableinterconnect network 28.

For example, bonding based on the transmission parameters may includeanalyzing a data bandwidth for one or more potential transactions anddetermining which data channels 72 are available for bonding orassignment to additively create the data bandwidth for the transactioncorresponding to the highest bandwidth usage. It is noted that bondingis inclusive of deciding to not bond or self-bond, resulting in a datachannel bonding of 1 (e.g., referring to FIG. 10, the data channel 72Cfor an example of a self-bonded data channel 72). Furthermore, based onthe priority of each transmission parameter, the bonding may change.Take, for example, the programmable interconnect network 28 depicted inFIG. 10. In this example, the first transaction prioritized bandwidthwhile the second and third transactions put less of a priority onbandwidth. The bonding decision was affected by this and thus the firsttransaction was assigned data channels 72A, 72B and address channel 74Awhile the second and third transactions were assigned to share the datachannel 72C.

Continuing on with the method 90, once the particular channels 72, 74are bonded based on the transmission parameters, the compiler 22 and/orthe computing system 18 may configure the integrated circuit 12 topower-gate any unused channels 72, 74 (block 96). Power-gating may occursimultaneously (or may start simultaneously) to the completion of thetransaction (e.g., to the sending of the data via the programmableinterconnect network 28). It should be noted that power-gating refers toreducing power supplied to any of the unused channels 72, 74. Power maybe gated to zero, at which point the unused channels 72, 74 may beconsidered powered-off. The compiler 22 and/or the computing system 18may program the integrated circuit 12 to initiate the power-gating orpowering-off to occur, such as via activation of one or more controlsignals to operate circuitry, such as switching circuitry, to cause thepower adjustments. The one or more control signals may be initiatedsubstantially similar to a start time of a data transmission associatedwith completing the transaction request. Since unused channels 72, 74are able to be power-gated or powered-off, utilization and powerconsumption may be based on actual use of the programmable interconnectnetwork 28 instead of based on an overall size if the programmableinterconnect network 28 (e.g., since more channels may consume morepower when none are being power-gated).

By using the above-described techniques and examples, a programmableinterconnect network that has a dynamic configurability may be provided.The programmable interconnect network may permit application-specificconfiguration and/or use-case specific programming of the programmableinterconnect network. Other benefits include realizing FPGA and/orintegrated circuit system power savings through power-gating orpowering-off unused channels and realizing footprint improvements sincea dynamic programmable interconnect network may reside in a smallerfootprint than other programmable interconnect networks that usemultiple point-to-point channels (e.g., as depicted in FIG. 7).Furthermore, these techniques described herein permit tailoring thebonding and programmable interconnect network configurations on aper-use basis based on transmission parameters that define bandwidthand/or latency considerations for the transaction.

While the embodiments set forth in the present disclosure may besusceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specificembodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and havebeen described in detail herein. However, it should be understood thatthe disclosure is not intended to be limited to the particular formsdisclosed. The disclosure is to cover all modifications, equivalents,and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the disclosureas defined by the following appended claims.

The techniques presented and claimed herein are referenced and appliedto material objects and concrete examples of a practical nature thatdemonstrably improve the present technical field and, as such, are notabstract, intangible or purely theoretical. Further, if any claimsappended to the end of this specification contain one or more elementsdesignated as “means for [perform]ing [a function] . . . ” or “step for[perform]ing [a function] . . . ”, it is intended that such elements areto be interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f). However, for any claimscontaining elements designated in any other manner, it is intended thatsuch elements are not to be interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f).

What is claimed is:
 1. An integrated circuit, comprising: a first logiccircuit; a second logic circuit; and a routing network disposed betweenthe first logic circuit and the second logic circuit, wherein therouting network comprises: a plurality of data channels; and a pluralityof routing circuits interconnected to each other through respectivechannels of the plurality of data channels, wherein a first routingcircuit of the plurality of routing circuits is configured to: receive afirst data packet from the first logic circuit, wherein the first datapacket comprises a first identifier; perform a first query of storedindications for the first identifier; and transmit, using a respectivedata channel of the plurality of data channels, the first data packet toa second routing circuit of the plurality of routing circuits based atleast in part on results of the first query.
 2. The integrated circuitof claim 1, comprising a plurality of logic circuits comprising thefirst logic circuit and the second logic circuit, wherein the pluralityof routing circuits is configurable to route data between a plurality ofcircuits comprising the first logic circuit and the second logiccircuit.
 3. The integrated circuit of claim 1, comprising bridgingcircuitry, wherein the first routing circuit is configured to: receive asecond data packet comprising a second identifier; perform a secondquery of the stored indications for the second identifier; and transmitthe second data packet to the bridging circuitry disposed between thefirst routing circuit and the first logic circuit based at least in parton results of the second query identifying the second data packet to bestored in the first logic circuit.
 4. The integrated circuit of claim 3,wherein the bridging circuitry is disposed at an interface between therouting network and the first logic circuit.
 5. The integrated circuitof claim 3, wherein the bridging circuitry corresponds to the firstlogic circuit, and wherein the bridging circuitry and additionalbridging circuitry are used when transmitting the second data packetbetween the second logic circuit and the first logic circuit.
 6. Theintegrated circuit of claim 5, wherein the first data packet is storedin the second logic circuit in parallel to the second data packet beingstored in the second logic circuit.
 7. The integrated circuit of claim1, wherein the plurality of data channels comprises an unused datachannel configured to consume less power while a data packet istransmitted by the plurality of data channels.
 8. The integrated circuitof claim 1, comprising a controller configured to: identify atransmission parameter to use when transmitting the first data packet;and generate a configuration to apply to the second routing circuitbased at least in part on the transmission parameter.
 9. The integratedcircuit of claim 8, wherein the transmission parameter comprises adirection of transmission, a destination bridge, a destination circuit,power considerations, latency considerations, bandwidth of data fortransmission, or any combination thereof.
 10. A device, comprising:reprogrammable logic fabric comprising a first logic circuit and asecond logic circuit, wherein the first logic circuit is configurable toperform a first operation according to data stored in register circuitcorresponding to the first logic circuit, and wherein the second logiccircuit is configurable to perform a second operation based at least inpart on an output from the first logic circuit; and a reprogrammablenetwork-on-chip configured to couple to the reprogrammable logic fabric,wherein the reprogrammable network-on-chip comprises a plurality of datachannels and a plurality of routing circuits interconnected to eachother through respective channels of the plurality of data channels,wherein a first routing circuit of the plurality of routing circuits isconfigured to transmit a first data packet to a second routing circuitof the plurality of routing circuits via a respective data channel ofthe plurality of data channels, wherein the plurality of routingcircuits is configurable to route data between a plurality of portionsof the reprogrammable logic fabric, and wherein the reprogrammablenetwork-on-chip is configurable to have variable transmission propertiesbased at least in part on a destination of the data selected from aplurality of logic circuits including the first logic circuit and thesecond logic circuit.
 11. The device of claim 10, wherein the firstlogic circuit and the second logic circuit are programmaticallyseparated from each other and have operations controlled based at leastin part on one or more values stored in separate configuration memories.12. The device of claim 10, wherein the reprogrammable network-on-chipcomprises an additional channel not powered based at least in part onthe variable transmission properties.
 13. The device of claim 10,wherein the variable transmission properties are configurable to changewith each data transmission.
 14. The device of claim 10, wherein theplurality of data channels includes at least one data channel that,during a data transmission, consumes less power than at least one otherdata channel involved in the data transmission.
 15. A method,comprising: determining to transmit a first data packet from a firstlogic circuit to a second logic circuit, wherein the first logic circuitand the second logic circuit comprise programmable fabric; generating aconfiguration to program a reprogrammable routing network to transmitthe first data packet from the first logic circuit to the second logiccircuit, wherein the reprogrammable routing network is disposed betweenand separate from the first logic circuit and the second logic circuit,and wherein the reprogrammable routing network comprises a plurality ofdata channels configurable to transmit the first data packet between aplurality of routing circuits when transmitting the first data packet;storing the configuration in a first subset of the plurality of routingcircuits to program the reprogrammable routing network to transmit thefirst data packet from the first logic circuit to the second logiccircuit; and transmitting the first data packet from the first logiccircuit to the second logic circuit using the first subset of theplurality of routing circuits.
 16. The method of claim 15, comprising:determining to transmit a second data packet from the first logiccircuit to a third logic circuit; generating an additional configurationto program the reprogrammable routing network to transmit the seconddata packet from the first logic circuit to the third logic circuit; andtransmitting the second data packet from the first logic circuit to thethird logic circuit at least partially in parallel to transmitting thefirst data packet.
 17. The method of claim 15, comprising reducing powersupplied to a second subset of the plurality of routing circuits,wherein the reprogrammable routing network comprises the second subsetof the plurality of routing circuits and the first subset of theplurality of routing circuits.
 18. The method of claim 15, whereingenerating the configuration comprises generating the configurationbased at least in part on a transmission parameter, wherein thetransmission parameter comprises an indication of a direction oftransmission, an indication of a destination, an indication of adestination location, an indication of power considerations, anindication of latency considerations, an indication of a transmissionbandwidth, an indication of prioritization, or any combination thereof.19. The method of claim 15, comprising generating an additionalconfiguration to program the first subset of the plurality of routingcircuits to transmit a third data packet from the first logic circuit tothird logic circuit after transmitting the first data packet.
 20. Themethod of claim 15, comprising generating an additional configuration toprogram the first subset of the plurality of routing circuits totransmit a command from control circuitry to the first logic circuitafter transmitting the first data packet.